You really are a piece of work, aren't you, Pugs.
First-off, any slime who sends me his threats or slams I can care less about
Debatable, but I can't really find too much fault with that. Personally, I might react the same way to threats, but I wouldn't make public a private slam. That doesn't make it wrong that you did so, though.
I also posted one of Webers', we trade the funny ones like baseball cards?
Interesting. I need to double-check on a friend's AOL setup. May be a difference in version, but I know with the versions of AOL I've seen (as well as any email program I've ever seen), the headers you cut and pasted with the messages would've indicated either that the messages had been forwarded to you by Weber. And any of them would've listed pugstko@aol.com as the recipient, even if the original message were to someone else and had been forwarded.
Whats' it to you?
It should be quite obvious. Do I need to spell it out for you?
I noticed that you weren't upset by the content of the E-Mails or who sent them, I suggest that thats' very telling about you.
Pray tell, what does that tell you about me?
Sorry I don't find these low-lifes "sacred" like you.
Well, I could use your frequently flawed logic and say that you are now a liar, but I won't. Suffice it to say that your reading comprehension is seriously flawed. I didn't say the people were sacred. I said the unwritten rule of email being confidential is sacred to me. Do you see the difference? It's as plain as can be. |
