SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : j.c.penney

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: X-Ray Man5/16/2017 2:35:19 PM
   of 111
 
Earnings report was viewed as dismal. While there was an upside surprise, it was due to sale of property which happened to be an asset on the operational side of the books. This was clearly explained, but some analysts took this as an attempt to "hide" the loss. Loss was worse than expecting, after subtracting for the asset sale, due to poor SS comps, although almost all of the negatives occurred in February, with recovery of sales in March and April. Nevertheless, this was taken as a confirmation of the failure of the turn around taking hold, especially in the wake of poor sales reported at both Macy's and Nordstrom's just previously. Stock dropped precipitously. On the other hand, nothing suggested that the plan already put in place was not on track, and management maintained their prediction of profit for the full year. Moreover, the SSS challenge with poor February matched what was reported by other department and apparel stores before and now after. Today, TJ Maxx reported poor results too, with the same bad February followed by March and April recover. I believe that is why JCP stock had a major uptick today, since it suggests the story is industry wide and even the best performers where affected in the same way, and thus JCP may have been seen as oversold. Will this just be a post dump bounce, or part of a longer slow recovery? I still think the latter, or at this cheap price, that an acquisition seems even more likely, perhaps by a private fund.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext