SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Brumar89 who wrote (77077)5/22/2017 12:06:20 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) of 86355
 
Did carbon starvation kill off the megafauna?

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/05/20/official-climate-agenda-is-always-the-negative-side-never-fair-and-balanced/

on Williams

May 20, 2017 at 4:32 pm

Really Skeptical…At the depths of the last ice age, the CO2 was 180 ppmv. At that count, a lot of vegetation is stunted and at 150 ppmv, photosynthesis starts to completely shut down and a lot of higher plant/life forms on earth would become completely extinct. And this was only about 18,000 -20,000 years BP. In geological time, that is yesterday. In fact, 47 species of Mega Fauna went extinct during that period of the most recent ice age retreat. And it wasn’t due to over hunting by early humans, because Clovis culture also nearly went extinct. Some speculate that a bolide hit the ice sheet and caused extreme melting and burning of what little vegetation there was in the middle latitudes of the northern hemisphere, although there is much missing evidence for everything, including whether Lake Aggizi catastrophically drained quickly into the Atlantic or Arctic oceans, causing a decline in the Thermohaline circulation.

At any rate, we do know that about 12,900 YBP, the Younger Dryas Event causes a major cooling for 1000 years and CO2 was only starting to recover from those extremely low counts during the peak of the ice age. Dismissing CO2 as an important GHG required for the survival of life on earth is dangerous, because we had been at the lowest concentrations of CO2 in hundreds of million years, near life extinction levels. Increasing it a little, with very little absolute temperature increase, while enjoying the benefits of a greening world should be a celebration of success by human kind. Don’t mistake visible air pollution for what they want to now call ‘carbon pollution’. Can’t even get the name right…

geology.gsapubs.org

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext