The Trump Presidency Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: bentway who wrote (19855)	5/29/2017 12:39:02 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (2) of 357511

I find it bizarre that persons, ostensibly of reasonable intellect, have no place in their tiny little minds for reasonable disagreements about this subject. Particularly, given the lies and cover-ups that have been ever-present since the late-90s. I don't know what the truth is, none of us does. But I know what it isn't. And that is that the models on which a lot of this bullshit is based do not work adequately to warrant jumping onboard with the kinds of massive spending we have undertaken and are asked to continue, in particular when we can't come close to meeting our obligations. Two years ago Steve McIntyre, whose work on this subject has been unassailable to date, showed that based on Christy's comparison with 102 IPCC models -- a model run will be warmer than an observed trend more than 99.5% of the time;will be warmer than an observed trend by more than 0.1 deg C/decade approximately 88% of the time;and will be warmer than an observed trend by more than 0.2 deg C/decade more than 41% of the time. Until someone can show that he is wrong statistically, the IPCC models are simply not adequate to move forward with. Now, if you want to call people "denialists" because they want actual proof that is on you.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next