SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: denizen48 who wrote (22051)6/19/2017 2:02:40 PM
From: Lane31 Recommendation

Recommended By
TimF

  Read Replies (1) of 360012
 
1. Somebody's oxen would be gored, if we went to single payer: insurance companies & drug companies come to mind instantly.

How they feel is beside the point in evaluating the efficacy of health care systems.

2. Then, doctors' work loads would probably be cut by 40%...just by not constantly having to fill out insurance forms. Hospitals could concentrate on health care, instead of dollar care. Administrative cost would shrink.

Those insurance forms include Medicare and Medicaid forms. They would still have Bernie forms to fill out. Obviously it would be more efficient to not have to deal with a variety of forms but the forms don't go away.

3. People would see their doctors more often, instead of emergency rooms.

They would also see their doctors more often, period. More cheaper visits vs fewer expensive visits? Take more than the back of an envelope to crack that one.

4. Is Canada or Germany going broke providing health care?

We've discussed the initiation of Canadian medicare in Saskatchewan way back when. Canadians have been acclimated to it. We are not in Saskatchewan way back when or even now. As for Germany, it doesn't have single payer so is also beside the point.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext