SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: i-node who wrote (22103)6/20/2017 12:36:31 PM
From: koan  Read Replies (1) of 359281
 
That post ranks up there with the most incorrect posts you have ever made.

The worlds climate scientists are not defined by those people who believe AGW, but rather as the most highly skilled atmospheric scientists i.e. ones with PHDs in atmospheric chemistry that teach at the worlds great universities. 97% of the most qualified scientist believe in it. And virtually ever major university in the world teach it as settled science.

And science is made more probable by using consensus. In this case as mentioned above 97% believe in it and every country in the world accepts it except three.

But above all you have never shown you have the educational ability to judge. You have no idea what the top atmospheric scientist know!

<<
The world's climate scientists are defined as those people who believe man-made CO2 is the main cause of climate change. So, there you go. Many of the great scientists alive today do not and would not commit themselves to this silly scheme.


Science is not about consensus, and certainly not arithmetically stupid consensus. The planet has been warming a minuscule amount, we do not know what causes it (although it is highly likely, almost certain, that we have SOMETHING to do with it) and it is doubtful it poses any real, long term problem.

The silliness of getting your panties in a wad over "global warming" cannot be overstated. It is yet another over-reaction in a long line of over-reactions by so-called scientists who want to be affiliated with the next big thing.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News