Politics of Energy Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Eric who wrote (78065)

7/7/2017 10:14:26 AM

From: Brumar89

Read Replies (1) of 86356

How do you know the surface of Puget Sound isn't saturated? You make bald assertions with nothing behind them.

Are you familiar with the word equilibrium? Water taking up or outgassing CO2 is an equilibrium reaction .... it happens because the atmosphere and water are constantly moving into equilibrium as temperature and pressure changes.

What's your basis for claiming that Henry's Law doesn't work in Puget Sound?

You need to show that Puget Sound has a lower CO2 content than it should.

The graph you provide only shows what the saturation point is for CO2 in seawater at specific temps at sea level.

Puget Sound is not saturated at sea level.

Far from it.

I believe the graph below shows how much CO2 the surface of Puget Sound holds, whatever the temperature is:

Incorrect.

It does not show what the surface of Puget Sound holds!

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next