SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Brumar89 who wrote (1024381)7/12/2017 1:05:31 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) of 1573408
 
Brumar, you don't understand technology then. Read up on Clipper yourself:

en.wikipedia.org

(No excuses. If you have the time to post dozens of times a day on Russian conspiracy theories, you have the time to learn a little bit about technology and information security.)

By the way, this isn't about the Fourth Amendment. This is about government fearing technology and trying to get Silicon Valley to build in backdoors for law enforcement. From the Wiki article above:
The Clinton Administration argued that the Clipper Chip was essential for law enforcement to keep up with the constantly progressing technology in the United States. While many believed that the device would act as an additional way for terrorists to receive information, the Clinton Administration said it would actually increase national security. They argued that because “terrorists would have to use it to communicate with outsiders -- banks, suppliers and contacts. The Government could listen in on those calls.”
Tenchusatsu

P.S. - If Apple is prevented from building an unhackable phone, what's to stop Samsung from doing just that? Or Huawei? Or Nokia?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext