International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: go4it who wrote (29663)	1/7/1998 10:01:00 PM
From: O. H. Rundell	Read Replies (1) of 35569

Did they only release those of the AA ? So it would seem, Chuck; but as usual, it is difficult to be certain. What they should have released (IMHO) is the results of each type of test to show the consistency. Still, I'm trying to understand why they're fooling with wet chemistry when they have a fire assay. The wet chemistry/AA stuff was done a couple of years ago. Can it be the fire assay isn't working, after all? [It has been my observation that when the claims of one PR become (how do I say this)...become "inoperative" (?), subsequent PRs simply ignore the now inoperative prior claims.] Can it be that we now find that we don't need a fire assay, after all? O. H.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next