EXCELLENT post Gene.Take Vivus for example: Suppose
-there was an open info site as to a)exactly what PadmaNathan had
received and b)from whom, INCLUDING VIVUS AND PFIZER.
-SUPPOSE again that we saw that Vivus gave him $25000 (hypothetical)
[" pocket money ", gg, " travel, meals, 'educational" etc expenes]
and Pfizer gave him $150,000 ( hypothetical), for same.
-when Padma comes out, 3 MONTHS!! ( hypothetical) AFTER pocketing
$150,000 and says " forget it guys, everything I wrote in the New
Engl J of Med 3 months ago about Muse's 65% efficacy is WRONG, AND,
by the way, I like Pfizer's product better even though by golly
I HAVE NO DEFINITE DATA ON IT,
then I ask you Gene, if Barrons would have been able to sell that kind
of trash to it's readers?
TA |
