SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
Investor Clouseau
lightshipsailor
rayrohn
To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (201707)8/28/2017 11:29:25 PM
From: weatherguru3 Recommendations   of 224729
 
I showed you global ACE plot. ACE nothing to do with increase in CO2. Besides, I have critiqued climate models. If you form more storms from the feedback mechanism of 'warmer water = more storms", it ends up cooling the Earth. Convection is a cooling process.

The only way to warm the planet with more convection in a climate model related to CO2 is develop an upper-tropospheric hot spot. None is observed. Thus, the models are wrong. Using models that are consistently wrong as a scientific basis is utter stupidity. This has nothing to do with CO2, which doesn't absorb infrared radiation above 0C. If CO2 had any indirect impact via a warming Arctic, then explain the 30-year cooling trend in the Arctic from 1945-1975, and 30-year cooling trend in Antarctica from 1980-2010-ish.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext