SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Biotech Short Candidates

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
Lance Bredvold
From: tuck10/4/2017 11:47:20 PM
1 Recommendation  Read Replies (3) of 897
 
Short candidate: Endocyte (ECYT). History of data distortion. Inlicensed a "phase 3 ready" radioligand for prostate cancer, which has shaky P2 data. Exploratory endpoints, retrospective analysis of cherry picked patients, etc. The P3 will not read out for some time. But the act of inlicensing this drug has caused a huge run up in recent days, about 250% this week. ECYT would be stupid not to go for some dilution. They are going to need the money, and they're not going to get a partner. They may not need it soon, though; they've got somewhere round $100 left after the upfront. Seems like a natural to front run a secondary here, but they may not do it as fast as some have recently. Thus a straight short seems better than an options play.

See German Multicenter Study Investigating 177Lu-PSMA-617 Radioligand Therapy in Advanced Prostate Cancer Patients

h/t to twitter's bio-clouseau, who highlighted this portion: "The major limitation of this study is its retrospective nature. Data were collected in 12 therapy centers, which caused inho- mogeneity of available data in terms of follow-up timeline and concomitant medication. Data might be biased by patient selection, loss of follow-up, and undocumented adverse events. Therefore, all inferential statistics are intended to be exploratory (hypotheses generating, as a limitation in all retrospective studies), not confirmatory, and are interpreted accordingly."

I don't think I've ever seen such caveats in a paper before. The ECYT press release does not highlight that . . .

Cheers, Tuck
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext