Paul F.
>>in re:
>>Oh you think because you didn't come right out and tell some poor smuck that believed all of your rah rah bad mouthing hyping balony about Intel to "BUY THE STOCK" that clears your name.
This statement bothers me a lot because it is simply untrue. The hype you refer to is generally analysis of INTeL's technology, which, face it, is superior, generally Dr. Engle is as much in the dark as everyone else about fluctuations in the market price.
Secondly, Dr. Engle has couselled me about the fluctuations and that possibly I shouldn't buy the stock!
I am probably one of those "smucks" you were referring to, BTW we prefer "schmuck", having bought at 101, but I certainly didn't buy on his, or anyone else's, recommendation; that was my decision. At that time my reasoning was that the price difference between 101 and any other price I pay will be negligable when I sell in 15-20 years, I stand by my reasoning.
>>Well that's what your whole career is about isn't it. You don't actually tell a lie but you don't actually tell the truth either. And you don't know the difference anymore.
If you never told half-truths about your company to an outsider, then it doesn't surprise me that you are self employed.
>>Boy did you sell your soul to the devil.
That's my line and besides I just talked to my wife, and she said that she hasn't signed anything with a 'Paul Engle'.
Ed. Thompson |
