SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO)
CSCO 77.38-0.5%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lerxst who wrote (11473)1/9/1998 3:20:00 PM
From: aladin  Read Replies (1) of 77400
 
Lerxst,

Lets all agree on semantics:

We all use the OSI model so here we go:

Connectivity
Device
Layer Generic Name Special Case

1 Repeater Multiport Repeater
2 Bridge Switch (Layer 2)
3 Router Switch (layer 3)

Now how do we 'create' a layer 2 switch - initially it was just a
multiport bridge, but then hardware and software was developed to
improve performance.

The layer 3 case is more complicated. Companies comming from the
layer 2 side added routing functionality to their switches using
several models (maybe Tom can comment on Bay's strategy).

In our case we have chosen a strategy of using a routing blade (born
of our IOS) that deals with the route decision, security and policy.
Once an approved connection is established its embedded in the
forwarding table and a layer 3 decision is made at layer 2 speeds.

Our 7000 series routers had this capability with a process called
silicon switching several years ago. Embedding this (proven)
technology on the 5500/5000 families was not trivial, but the use of a
full IOS on the routing blade means that instead of a simple routing
decision - our switches have the full run of access lists, security
and policy features available on routers.

John
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext