| | | (THREAD) I will discuss why Tom Arnold’s claim that “Tapes” exist of President Trump committing crimes is no hoax. (I want to thank @EdKrassen for his help on this as well). Since last December @TomArnold has claimed that tapes exist showing Trump doing and saying things...(1)
Brian Krassenstein ??? @krassenstein
Replying to @krassenstein @EdKrassen @TomArnold which America likely would not view very fondly. Arnold’s first claim was that he himself was in possession of an outtake tape from NBC’s The Apprentice, in which Trump is saying ‘every dirty, every offensive, racist thing ever.’ (2)
Then over the last several weeks he has alluded to there being multiple other tapes as well. This includes a tape similar to the infamous Ray Rice elevator tape, in which Trump assaults a woman...(3)
and then the most important tape, one which Putin had allegedly recorded during a phone call made during the 2013 Miss Universe Pageant in Moscow. (4)
I have been in communication with Arnold over the last 24 hours, and although I did not get exact details on what such tapes may be, Arnold was as serious as a massive heart attack and certainly understands the importance that each tape could have on Trump’s future. (5)
Remember, just because he may not have released anything publicly yet DOES NOT mean he is not in communication with the Special Counsel’s office. (6)
The Miss Universe Tape is the most important. It would almost undoubtedly be direct evidence of a quid pro quo between Putin and Trump, stemming all the way back to 2013. We now know that even though Putin did not show up to the pageant like he initially planned, he...(7)
did in fact speak to Trump. The proof of such is from Trump’s own mouth. See video below from the NPC Luncheon: t.co (8)
One theory as to why Putin planned to attend the pageant but canceled last minute could be that he wanted to be able to record the conversation easier (over the phone or more likely on a Skype-like video chat). At the 2013 pageant is where Trump appears to have received... (9)
confirmation on building a Trump Tower in Moscow. Such allegations are backed up by the fact that for the first time ever, within hours of the pageant, Trump mentions “Trump-Tower-Moscow” in the following tweet to Putin associate Aras Agalarov: (10)

This is the first half of the alleged quid pro quo. The second half? Trump running for President of the United States. How do we know that Trump likely promised Putin, and most certainly his associates who he had met during the pageant,that a Presidential Run was happening?(11)
Another Tweet! This time by a woman named Alferova Yulya. (12)

Yulya has been confirmed as having met Trump at the meeting, which took place during the 2013 Moscow Miss Universe pageant. In fact she is responsible for helping to set up the pageant and... (13)
works for Agalarov (remember the name Agalarov from the June 2016 Trump Tower Meeting with Don Jr. Manafort and Kushner?). This tweet was made in January 2014, a full 18 months prior to Trump announcing his run for President here in the United States. (14)
From here both Trump and Yulya have been caught up in multiple lies about this meeting and his trip to Moscow. The list of lies are substantial, pointing to Trump knowing that what he did or who he said during that long weekend in Moscow was not kosher. (15)
I would recommend this Thread by Seth Abramson @SethAbramson for additional tidbits of information about this meeting and the apparent quid pro quo that likely took place:https://t.co/NyGKwYIyYH (16)
Brian Krassenstein ??added,
Seth AbramsonVerified account @SethAbramson 71/ The result is major media is months behind the actual state of this investigation—the state independent journalists with backgrounds in the law and/or journalism have brought it to—and these journalists are sourcing their work and checking it daily against the work of others.
Now lets look at Arnold’s claims stemming back from last December about an Apprentice tape in which Trump says ‘every dirty, every offensive, racist thing ever.’ Note that Arnold claimed that he was not releasing the tape himself, but would rather wait for those who had... (17)
given it to him to publish it. Those behind this tape are rightfully being cautious when it comes to its release. Make note that everyone working on The Apprentice signed an NDA and those who break that NDA are facing a lawsuit which could cost them $5 million+. (18)
If this isn’t enough to prevent the release of such a tape, the fact that the entertainment industry very well could banish them for breaking such an NDA would likely do the trick. Unlike the Miss Universe Tape, in which a crime has allegedly been committed... (19)
Trump using vulgar language to describe African Americans, Jews or other groups is not a crime, therefore the NDA would still hold up. On the other hand, if the Special Counsel’s office subpeonaed these individuals for the tape, the NDA would be null and void. (20)
The third tape, the Ray-Rice-like tape, is the most interesting. Arnold made such allegations for the first time yesterday in the following tweet: (21)
 Arnold alludes to two individuals having either seen the tape, AJ Benza and a man named David Pecker. Arnold is actually in the process of calling out Benza on Twitter, who has known Trump for three decades and has made salacious allegations about him in the past. (22)
Benza, up until this point doesn’t appear to be providing Arnold with what he wants, but the two are supposedly still discussing things both publicly, on Twitter and privately. (23)
Arnold has assured me that He will come forward with what he knows but he wants to give those in possession of the information, and those who the information may have passed through an opportunity to come clean on their own. He even suggests the following: (24)

Now here’s the kicker… Shortly after Arnold had made the claims of such tapes existing this week, reports have surfaced that Trump is now claiming to a US Senator and an adviser that the Access Hollywood “Grab them by the pussy” tape may be fake. (25)
Of course this is counter to him admitting in late 2016 that it was in fact his voice on the tapes, and that his comments were merely “locker room talk”. t.co (26)
Why would Trump suddenly change his story unless of course he knows that Arnold’s claims are true and he wants to muddy the waters around any tapes which may surface in the coming days and weeks ahead? (27) |
|