SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Zenyatta Free Speech Board
ZEN 77.480.0%Nov 21 4:00 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Clyde Spaulding who wrote (20458)11/29/2017 8:36:27 AM
From: the Chief1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Edwinder12

  Read Replies (1) of 22811
 
Nothing that was not expected.The first thing they say is it does not comply. It does, there municipal Plan and Bylaws are not in compliance with each other. Judge has already ruled in our favour. In fact Le Gris was going to appeal the Judges ruling,on the 28Feb so this is not unexpected they would try to stop the process as if they run the process.

As far as CCB mentioning anything about this, the Council has made a request to withdraw their approval based on something they have already lost on, in court. So the mere fact that Councillor Le Gris did the leg work for CCB is somewhat amusing. We site the court ruling. The application is not there's to withdraw. Until a decision is made by Prov of Quebec, its a request that's all.

The mere fact they are trying to withdraw an approval based on non compliance will just get them fed their own Le Gris Injunction ruling. So not sure why they are approaching it that way.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News