SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Y2K (Year 2000) Stocks: An Investment Discussion
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Josef Svejk who wrote (8842)1/10/1998 8:19:00 AM
From: Doug from CT  Read Replies (1) of 13949
 
please, not to mistake my meaning. Original message to you was because of your higher visibility on this thread and to initiate some dialogue based on fact on a name still being largely ignored at least by this particular community, not to get "you" to buy stock.

I guess you could say I'm looking for thoughtful responses. For instance, sure, I know the list of risk factors in the Zmax registration statement. But if 80% of them really are true of every company in the industry, then I don't think you can single them out as "risky" on that basis. Of course I concede that they're at an earlier stage of development; tried to make that clear in my first post.

Anybody else care, or should we just wait for business events to prove this right or wrong?

By the way, if anybody has comments on Strategia, I'd like to hear them. Can't figure it out.

Doug
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News