Arizona Supreme Court Orders Release Of Climategate-Related Emails
DECEMBER 7, 2017
By Paul Homewood
Hot off the press:
Washington, D.C. – Late last week Arizona Superior Court Justice James Marner granted the Energy & Environment Legal Institute’s (E&E Legal’s) motion requesting release of ‘Climategate’ related emails withheld for years by the University of Arizona (UofA).
The Court’s ruling followed on the Arizona Board of Regents’ (AzBOR’s) unsuccessful appeal of a similar ruling by the same Court on June 14, 2016 ordering release of the emails in question.
In his ruling, Judge Marner stated, “The comment in the June 14, 2016 ruling regarding the creation of an academic privilege through legislation seems to have caused much confusion to the point that the Court of Appeals concluded this Court somehow remained ignorant of an argument raised in Defendant AzBOR’s answer and amended answer, subsequent pleadings and in at least two amicus briefs. With this ruling, the Court hopes to reassure the Court of Appeals and the parties that all arguments made at the trial level were considered and all relevant law applied.”
The original public records request and the subsequent suit by E&E Legal made necessary by the U of A’s refusal to release the records relating to what the London Telegraph’s Christopher Booker called “the worst scientific scandal of our generation.” Specifically, the documents are emails relating to the notorious global warming “Hockey Stick”, and the group that made it famous, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
Following E&E Legal’s public records request to UofA, the University acknowledged resistance from the professors involved — both of whom, E&E Legal pointed out to the court, were improperly allowed to decide what emails were responsive to the request, and which ones they would allow the University to produce. U of A ultimately produced several hundred responsive emails.
Accompanying this production was an instructive 213-page roadmap of several hundred emails the academics insisted could not be released, involving either the “Hockey Stick” or IPCC. Unfortunately the indexes were also deliberately scarce on details, though they do lay out correspondence between the Hockey Stick and IPCC authors (also identifying, e.g., emails about Professor and IPCC coordinating lead author Jonathan Overpeck’s work at the University for the environmentalist pressure group Union of Concerned Scientists, and emails to and from Phil Jones of the University of East Anglia, home to ClimateGate).
E&E Legal’s initial complaint explained how these emails, produced using taxpayer resources, involve two academics with: “…a history of using University (public) resources — including to send and receive the emails at issue in this case — for work-related participation in related organizations including the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (“IPCC”), which was the subject of many of the most controversial emails produced, sent, received and/or held on publicly funded computer assets in the ‘Climategate’ leaks.”
Through the Climategate leaks, and releases under various freedom of information laws, the public has learned of troubling practices by a network of publicly funded academics involving, among other things, questionable use of statistics, organized efforts to subvert transparency laws in the United States and United Kingdom, campaigns to keep dissenting work from publication, recruiting journalists to target opponents and retaliation against scientists and editors involved in publishing dissenting work.
Closely following a model pioneered by Greenpeace seeking emails and other records of University of Virginia climate science faculty, E&E legal has been requesting and obtaining information held by publicly funded agencies and universities related to the important public policy issue of alleged catastrophic man-made global warming, and related policy demands.
thegwpf.com
Of course the original Climategate emails only directly concerned the UEA. There is undoubtedly much else out there at other sites.
The fact that the University of Arizona illegally withheld hundreds of emails strongly suggests that they have a lot to hide.
Get the popcorn ready!
notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com
Mike Jackson PERMALINK
December 8, 2017 1:05 pm
Tree rings are proxies for weather! Of which CO2 is a part, as are sun, rain, wind, heat, cold, wind from a different direction. Then there is location, competitive growth, nibbling rabbits, deer sharpening their antlers, wind-born infections, volcanic dust …
That anybody ever thought to pick out one signal from all that stuff beggars belief.
Joan Gibson PERMALINK
December 8, 2017 1:29 pm
As I have pointed out before and recently, dendrochronology has its uses. Dating can be done by overlapping tree ring cores. Long term trends showing prolonged drought, such as that which led to the demise of Mesa Verde, etc. or long term cold spells or warm spells or periods of high rainfall can be inferred using this method. HOWEVER, CO2 and other specific items cannot be determined as there is too much “noise.” So many factors can mask what is happening–did that tree grow near water or not near water, did a nearby tree have roots into a pocket of moisture? I read some of the emails when they came out in ca. 2009. There was one data base from the Yamal Peninsula of some 250 trees, but they “chose” 24 as I remember, because they had the “right stuff.” Sorry, that is not science as they cherry picked and 24 trees is too small a data base to mean squat. I believe it was Briffa who based a statement on THREE trees. Seriously?
What dendrochronology HAS shown is a corroboration of the Little Ice Age. This led to the hypothesis that Stradivarius violins may have resulted from the cold of the LIA slowing down the growth significantly and providing the wood with that characteristic sound.
However, Mann and his merry band REMOVED the Little Ice Age and the previous Medieval Warming from history in order to create his “straight” hockey stick handle. The hockey stick was far from inevitable, it was fabricated. |
