10 Reasons The Republican Attacks On Clean Energy & Electric Vehicles Are So Smart
     Facebook  Twitter  Google+  Pinterest   December 11th, 2017 by   Zachary Shahan 
     Republicans are interesting creatures.  There are the voters, and then  there are the politicians. The voters  like things like clean air,  jobs, Social Security, and ice cream. The  politicians, on the other  hand, like to let corporations pollute as much  as they want, have been  known to crash a global economy from time to  time, seem to always be  looking for a way to “legitimately”  cut holes in the social safety net  (note: they’re working on a super  clever attempt to do this right now),  and like to melt ice cream via  flamethrowers when the ice cream eater  isn’t looking.
   But hey, in the spirit of Monday, below  are 10  reasons the latest Republican attacks on clean energy and  electric  vehicles might actually be a good thing.
   1. The oil, coal,  and  natural gas industries simply haven’t had a fair enough head start  via  government subsidies. The trillions in subsidies they’ve received  from  the US government in the past several decades are not enough to put   them on equal footing with renewable energy and electric vehicles   today. Thus, it only makes sense to cut cleantech subsidies and give   fossil fuels more subsidies for the time being.
   2. While many  people  — the vast majority of them — don’t like pollution, some people  prefer  to breathe in potentially cancer-causing pollutants. It’s not  fair that  those people normally don’t get a say. It’s unfair that  people who like  pollution are always on the losing end of the  conversation. They have a  right to freedom of speech as well! Since the  pollution lovers don’t get  enough airtime, we should just cut any  governmental support for clean  technologies. That should balance things  out.
   3. Taking away  subsidies prematurely hurts investor  confidence in the government and  crushes medium- and long-term  investment plans. This is good since it’s  the government’s role to  indiscriminately attack and destabilize the  investment community. Well,  it’s good when it comes to renewable energy  and electric vehicles.  It’s not good when it comes to oil, gas, coal,  and nuclear, all of  which should continue to get subsidies.
   4. Putting  government  money into young and quickly developing industries increases  the chance  or extent to which our society will benefit from 21st century   technological and economic leadership. If the US supports such   industries, that is not really fair to the Chinese. The Chinese are   working hard and trying to be practical in order to become a bigger and   bigger economic player, so why should we interfere? China deserves a   massive economic win in the remainder of the century due to its   foresight — and just because it’s China’s turn. Yeah?
   5. Air  pollution  disproportionately hurts lower-income communities. The goal  of any good  government should be to hurt the lower-income and  middle-income masses  while giving more money to the super rich. That’s  just good governance.
      
   6. A livable climate is super overrated. We’re all going to be   living on Mars soon anyway. Why waste time and money on trying to protect Earth and its human inhabitants.
    7. Supporting clean  energy and electric vehicles would improve our  national security and our  resilience in the face of various global fuel  challenges. That’s just  not much fun. It’s much more exciting to put  lives at risk via more wars  and dependence on foreign imports. (Also,  those wars are great for our  national debt. Just ask George W. Bush.)
    8. Healthy citizens  live longer, which means more services and support  for those people over  time. It’s cheaper and simpler if large numbers  of American citizens  die prematurely from high levels of pollution and  more extreme natural  disasters. Duh.
          
    9. Billionaires and big corporations in the oil, gas, and coal  industries put millions of dollars into buying Republican politicians   funding Republican campaigns. It would be a horrible message for the   world and a breakdown in our democracy if it turned out billionaires and   big corporations couldn’t shape the law of the land in a way that   benefited them over others.
   10. Come on — the  whole world needs  to come crashing down in order to instill a little  humility. How will  we put our collective ego into check if we don’t tank  the economy, tank  our health, and destroy our climate?
      
   1 Via  hyper-deregulation and continuously shifting  more of a society’s  wealth to the super rich while protecting them from  the ramifications  of large-scale gambling.
   cleantechnica.com |