2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 366.09

-0.1%

Nov 6 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

Elroy Jetson

To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (137075)	12/12/2017 7:45:19 AM
From: elmatador	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) of 217557

Social media battles today what I battled for 10 years in the thread: QUOTE we have the free speech / hate speech debate on social platforms like Twitter: should Twitter be completely neutral as to what gets said on its platform? Or does it have a responsibility to monitor what’s being said, suspend or ban people from posting threats or other problematic content? (In other words, “allocate network resources away from people saying things we don’t like?”) UNQUOTE With freedom comes responsibility. The irresponsible should not have freedom. Hate speech and fake news and weirdoes always existed. But they did not have a platform to broadcaat. Social Media gave them a platform. There we are.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next