to follow-up Message 31407321 at the risk of being repeated accused of showboating like a peacock strutting across the shooting gallery to the boar pen.
the doc is visiting again this day, to info results of blood tests on wife and her companion.
i am admitted noting way outside of my comfort zone, but am learning and so repeating what i thought i heard, by and by
am going to ask the doctor what he was testing for in the blood (presumably including cancer markers as stem cell therapy is definitely not for non-blood cancers, am to understand), and info him that my friend in hk wishes to dialogue w/ him. my hk-based friend wishes to bring light-activated (photobiomodulation(?)-enhanced) (cd41?) stem cell therapy from germany to hk, but i have alerted him that there may be better (more enthusiastic) partner nearer to HK.
the german tech is based on using laser excitation to encourage patients own stem cells within the bone marrow to 'jump' into the blood flow, be harvested via catheter, isolated, and re-injected directly to body sites needing 'fixing'. my friend got fixed for tendonitis that had been afflicting him since 30+ years ago, and a white euro male condition whereby he could not make a fist. His two issues are no more, and his hair turned dark, and his physical appearance is now more robust. pretty amazing.
my friend is waiting for report on the last condition he was hoping the therapy can help to fix - he is high (way off of the chart) in metal poisoning due probably to some supplements he takes in or his preference for seafood. his own stem cells were injected into his solar plexus - he turned himself into a lab rat - to see if the stem cells can somehow turn into macrophage cells to envelop metal - he shall undergo metal testing soon to see if any decrease, and if so, then chelation would not be necessary. watch & brief.
the doctor explained to me that autologous stem cell therapy are good for localised conditions such as tendonitis, burn, etc etc, and would in some sense rejuvenate and energise, but the stem cells collected from belly fat shows age of patient whereas cells from bone marrow are less effected by age.
in malaysia donor stem cell therapy is allowed, supposedly best for rejuvenation.
they collect perhaps 8K donations of umbilical cord stem cell per annum as such are best (efficacious) and had heretofore not been rejected by donee. the donation must be from qualified folks (3 generations not showing whatever), and the cells injected are not of X(?) generation and older. blah blah blah.
there is also apparently already collection of stem cells from tooth pulp - it is perhaps the only source of adult donor stem cell that is not rejected by donees.
all seems like black magic to me, but sensing that the various methods are at the forefront of something but not popular.
watch & brief, even as the peanut gallery crowd may continue to disturb the peace |
