2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 374.22

-0.2%

Nov 21 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

Oblivious

To: TobagoJack who wrote (137609)	12/29/2017 8:10:56 PM
From: Elroy Jetson	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) of 217944

Utter nonsense. There is no universally accepted stem cell, not from tooth pulp, umbilical cords or any other source, without editing the cell's DNA. To this date all attempts to edit the DNA of stem cells turns them into "not stem cells". Short of this, the stem cell needs to be from the donor. Even close matches between donor and recipient usually requires the ongoing use of anti-rejection drugs. You're consorting with a charlatan. As for the blood metals voodoo, or flashing colored LED lights for orthodontists, I won't even bother as you've already said you're financially invested in such . . .

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next