I lied I'm back. Pugs is doing what he feels is necessary to not only protect his investment but to also protect others. Maybe in doing so it will pave the way to prevent this from ever happening again to another group of investors like us.
But it's on the premise that it's because it's a broker bashing RMIL. Excuse me for being mundane, but that seems a little picky in and of itself. The fact that he is a broker is an excuse, IMO, for being outraged enough to file. Do you really think Michael's comments have any more weight or he has found anything out that another Nay couldn't? If the answer is yes, then we differ on opinion and this argument is shot. If the answer is no, then it is indeed just an excuse to file. Hey, if the issue is it's because he's a broker, then lodge complaints with the proper authorities and leave it at that. Otherwise, this is a civil suit which really has nothing to do with Michael being a broker, only with a dislike for someone who bashes the investment. Where does it end, am I next for these comments?
To answer your questions, is it fair, I don't think so, is it ethical, apparently not, is it irresponsible, I don't know. What I do know is only my opinion that it does not warrant a civil suit. |
