SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS)
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: michael d kugler who wrote (35943)1/12/1998 12:42:00 AM
From: Riley G  Read Replies (1) of 55532
 
Quid Pro Quo is it?

ZAPARA is not named in Morks suit number ED CV-97-300 in USDC, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA and ZAPARA is a resident of CA.

Also named in the charges of complaint is Scott Meyers.
Reference paragraph number 14 on the mentioned complaint.

14. Defendant SCOTT MEYERS (hereinafter referred to as "MEYERS") is a resident of California.

Unless you can post Mork vs Zapara court case number, your story sucks wind and you now it. Better get your facts straight.

By the way what happened to the J. Does 1-50 to be named in the suit? UIs mork filing against them in there State of Residence...LOL

To answer your question: I am not related to anyone on the RMCW or RMIL BOD's> Are you?

By the way, is the MVPH CEO related to anyone from PRTI? And did they sign paperwork stating that they were not related to anyone from the other company (PRTI to MVPH)? I think you would find that interesting, as you would see why MVPH is trying to get RMCW's 4 million shares ($14 Million augmentation agreement) shares back!

Riley G
______________________________________________________________________
To: Riley G (35660 )
From: michael d kugler Sunday, Jan 11 1998 5:32PM EST
Reply # of 35706

Zapara is named in a civil suit (by Mork) in California, his State of residence. And he has been served in that suit. The charges are essentially the same. The suit you cite is the federal suit in which residents of a State outside California are named. Try to give us the whole story next time.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News