busied self doing work on computer whilst watching my day's free-meal / tag-along wager with weekly dinner friend go correctly, betting on the super bowl
did not and do not know anything about the teams, and cannot say i know anything about the game
just tagging a friend who actually does the betting, pulling the triggers and occasionally hedge the bets, who by evidence of history pans out. have much bandwidth for the friend and weekly dinners
the wines always super
w/r to the wagers, everything turned out well from a few of the lead-up games, w/ 100% spot-on calls and payouts for the season, and now, down to the wire and just done done, a final win, for some number of free-meals
am wondering if my friend is not in the wrong business of fund management
today (early am hk) friend decided to not hedge, and turned out to be another good call
perhaps you see why i have very little bandwidth for non-productive theorising and refrain from engaging w/ such, especially when the theories hardly even qualify as surmises
the cafe is meant to be relevant, efficacious, courteous, profitable, ... learning useful stuff that turns into meals on the table, supported by history of evidence, well-tested, found to be true, and and and
the cafe is duper
cannot understand why you first ran it into ruin, called a lot of good folks olives, and have been trying darnest to do worst and denigrate ...
must try much harder
 |
