Tonto,
I understand that, but some are using fundamentals to evade the squeeze. I , personally , don't want to knock everyone over the head with these cases, and I was hoping to spring that on Kugler later, but the civil case was kicked-out and filed again in the Superior court. It's the SAME suit, EXCEPT it omits ZApara, why? This brings us back to the squeeze....and Morks short position, and , IMO , Kuglers' presence here. There is no other FEDERAL CASE, this IS the FEDERAL CASE, it omits Zapara and was the same CIVIL CASE ( sans Zapara ) that was filed in the wrong venue.
I can't find another case that was filed for Calif. residents or a FEDERAL CASE where Zapara was named....though, Kugler claims Zapara wasn't named in the FEDERAL CASE, the FEDERAL CASE 'is' the CIVIL SUIT!, Why didn't ZAPARA make it into the suit filed in the Superior court?
Pugs |
