The Trump Presidency Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: i-node who wrote (57298)	2/21/2018 10:51:42 AM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) of 362976

But your assumption is that the reason the numbers are higher is because of the rifles which is tenuous. I am doing no such thing. I'm merely covering all the basis, being thorough, as I have stated more than once during this discussion. It's common sense to look at both costs and benefits of any proposal. As I stated at the outset, the cons of the proposal to ban have been ignored by both those who favor (out of either lack of recognition or willingness to acknowledge) and those who oppose (auto-rejection). Looking at the pros and cons of a proposal is not the same as looking at the cons of one proposal vs the pros of a counter-proposal. [I have written before about my experience designing and facilitating meetings for consensus. I was trained by the folks who were with Carter at Camp David. I offer, for free <g>, the first rule, which is that no one can bring a proposal into the room as one does in a negotiation. The parties need to start with a clean sheet of paper. The methodology builds from there. I think that what we have been discussing illustrates why proposals are deadly.]

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next