SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS)
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Pugs who wrote (36138)1/12/1998 4:01:00 PM
From: s martin  Read Replies (1) of 55532
 
Are you now saying there IS a FEDERAL case, now that it has been proven to you? It appears there were two cases filed one federal...
and one in the CA State Superior court. Seems once again you accused Mike of lying and he then showed that you were the one who was lying. I expect your next post will say there was no Federal case filed by Mork naming Zapara, when he was wearing a funny little hat. Maybe you'll get it right some time. This time you were way off base calling Mike a liar.

To: +michael d kugler (35888 )
From: +Pugs Sunday, Jan 11 1998 11:15PM EST
Reply # of 36127

Mike,
Mork filed for bankruptcy in '93
You said Zapara was named in another suit other than the "FEDERAL CASE".....I don't know of a FEDERAL CASE! Follow me.....Magellan put out a press release stating Zapara was named in a suit filed in the SUPERIOR COURT of CALIF....you following me?.....YOU SAID, that Zapara was named in a case filed in Calif.? Is this a different case than the one filed in the SUPERIOR COURT of Calif., and where did you hear about a FEDERAL CASE. You pride yourself on your DD and your honesty, I'm sure you'll respond to the direct questioning.
Pugs

To: +michael d kugler (35960 )
From: +Pugs Monday, Jan 12 1998 12:24AM EST
Reply # of 36124

What FEDERAL CASE?
What second Calif. case?
You said these things, you must have some proof other than a bunch of yes-men saying how great you DD is, Mike...you're lying.
Pugs
To: +michael d kugler (35905 )
From: +Pugs Sunday, Jan 11 1998 11:31PM EST
Reply # of 36126

Why do you refuse to answer the questions?
Q: You said Zapara was named in the suit filed in the superior court of
Calif., he wasn't....why are you saying you didn't say this?
Q: You said there was a FEDERAL CASE...Why has no one heard about it
except you?
Q: Are you saying a second suit was filed in Calif. where Zapara is
named?
Pugs
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News