Dividend investing for retirement Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Dividend investing for retirement

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: geoffrey Wren who wrote (28853)	3/6/2018 1:33:23 PM
From: E_K_S	Read Replies (2) of 34328

I listened to the CC and was quite impressed w/ the new machine efficiencies and their advantage (at least for now) in the ultra premium product market. They are converting to this ultra product mix as they have pricing power and higher margins. They are only at 65% capacity and have two more customers as they move more production into this category w/ June/July 2018 for them. That s/d bring up capacity at/near 90%. The big issue is product input costs which they have little control over. Also, some of their contracts require delivery to the customer (or their warehouse) and that was $1mln last quarter and is an added cost. The CEO is not worried about selling new ultra premium products, and order are eaisly obtained (from the CC) and that is where they have a big competitive advantage. Their debt interest went from 5.5% to ober 7% YoY due to the covenant bank waiver fees but still not too bad when you consider what they would have to pay if they floated a preferred issue and/or a corporate debt note. CEO seems to think their bank financing will work fine especially if they can expand EBITDA and FCF. I did not look at the covenant terms which CEO said contained some additional terms. I still think this stock is valued at high teens. Other manufacturing facility was boxed into standard non premium product that has no pricing power and impacted by input costs. All input costs higher w/ lumber/paper prices on the rise, so that earlier model would be a money loser. I agree that dividend is way out and definitely impacted by input commodity prices. TIS has become a possible take out candidate. FWIW, there was no mention in CC on their Mexico partnership which was a big component. I believe partner sold their interest but I thought the U.S. sales deals still existed. I did another small buy @ $9.40/share that added 15% more shares to my current position. TIS becomes a GARP stock and will need to see what EBITDA looks like at the beginning of Q3 2018 period. EKS

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next