Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: RetiredNow who wrote (1060000)	3/12/2018 5:58:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (2) of 1572214

Mindmeld, the difference between religion and science is already clear to me. That's how I can separate the science of environmentalism from the dogma. Most environmentalists cannot. To them, it's a way to virtue-signal and impose their self-righteousness on everyone else. Whether or not any of their actions have a measurable effect on the environment means little to them, as long as they have good intentions. That's why the word "science" has become a bludgeon for these environmentalists. Can't debate against the now-debunked "hockey stick graph" because SCIENCE! Can't debate against Bill Nye, the so-called "science guy," when he predicts more Hurricane Katrinas, because SCIENCE! Can't debate the California state government saying everything needs a Prop. 65 warning because SCIENCE! Can't debate global warming because that just makes you a "denier." Because SCIENCE! That's where environmentalism leaves the rails. That's where it turns into a religion. And the Pascal's Wager of environmentalism becomes insufficient because it doesn't address the dogmatism. Tenchusatsu

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next