SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: koan who wrote (63107)3/28/2018 1:43:20 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 361112
 
I did not say make.

So your perfectly ok with banks or any other employer not hiring people because they have "a ring in her nose and bells on her toes and a tatto on her body and blue hair"? Or if not quite perfectly ok with it you would make no effort at compulsion whatsoever to push them to hire such a person?

Even if that is the case I still wouldn't quite agree with your "Yeah, that is called freedom.", implying that if an employer chooses not to make such hires it is reducing freedom not exercising its own. Getting to make the decision is freedom. Changing the decision may (or may not) be positive, may be an example of greater tolerance for the specific appearance in question or more unusual appearances in general, but thats a different point.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News