SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Zenyatta Free Speech Board
ZEN 77.480.0%Nov 21 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: stuffbug who wrote (21968)4/19/2018 9:27:54 AM
From: Clinteroo   of 22811
 
Stuffbug, it appears that any missed payments results in the balance being due and payable. This is an acceleration clause which is relatively common in contracts.

I would agree that AE does not have an obligation to accept shares. So why would he? Anyone would take cash instead of shares.

If the dissidents win, I dont think they have much of an argument against AE. The best argument they have is that the recent agreement is not done in good faith and, therefore, not enforceable. However, I dont think there is much of an argument. The original employment agreement has been around for many years. Everyone knew about it... or at least should have. The original agreement calls for severance to be paid immediately. This new agreement spreads it out over many years so it is better for the company so I think they have an uphill battle.

Will be interesting to watch. Wonder which "great" graphite company will do worse over the next 12 months... quite a battle we have going....
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext