SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Zentek Ltd.
ZEN.V 0.970-2.0%Dec 12 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Zengold who wrote (15926)4/20/2018 11:49:24 AM
From: Cinema Show  Read Replies (4) of 54257
 
ZENforward opened the door to the 900k as soon as they called for the removal of the CEO. That was a contractual agreement and was surely a consideration in moving their action forward. On the other side AE could have decided to leave immediately and take the 900k lump sum and cause an even bigger crisis. He didn't though. If I was in that position I would have taken the lump sum without any regard to anyone else. What would you have done ,,, pass on it?

He has a right to it, so credit him for easing the burden. And the share price drop could also be messaging from either side to invoke fear/threat; or simply traders taking advantage or the Market responding to no CEO and the dispute impacts.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext