| | | Lets hope this is true
 Support Thread Reader!
Thread by @drawandstrike: ""Why would Flynn plead guilty to a crime he hadn't committed if he was innocent?" Well. I can answer that now. First read this: When a prose […]"
21 tweets 5 hours ago
Embed Stealth Jeff @drawandstrike Follow Read on Twitter
"Why would Flynn plead guilty to a crime he hadn't committed if he was innocent?"
Well. I can answer that now.
First read this:
When a prosecution team DELIBERATELY WITHHOLDS exculpatory evidence from a defendant & he pleads guilty:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brady_v._…
That's known in legalese as 'a Brady case'.
This is a very serious example of misconduct by the Feds. Remember Cliven Bundy? The fed. prosecutors ended up having their case against him thrown out because they withheld evidence.
If you're a prosecutor and you get caught having hidden exculpatory evidence from a defendant you are prosecuting, and you induced that defendant to PLEAD GUILTY while withholding that evidence from them, you have done a VERY BAD THING
Former Trump NSA Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn pleaded guilty in a fed. courtroom to having lied to FBI investigators during an interview.
Well that was it! Open and shut case, right? Flynn admitted he lied, right? ??
Well stop and back up for a minute. Flynn and his legal team got a good look at the EVIDENCE the FBI supplied to prove he lied during his interview with Peter Strzok & another FBI agent.
What if they realized the evidence was faked?
In other words, the FBI 302 forms, which are filled out following these interviews, as now presented to the court, they have Flynn saying things he never said.
Flynn and his team would instantly realize this could be turned into a Brady case.
Now this strategy would take balls of brass steel. You would be counting on being able to PROVE there was exculpatory evidence out there that the prosecution was hiding from you AFTER you pleaded guilty.
I think Flynn & his team knew they could prove it.
At the time Flynn pled guilty in late October, DOJ IG Michael Horowitz had been on the job digging into FBI/DOJ malfeasance since January. Huber had begun his own investigation likely by July of 2017.
It could be Flynn & his team were alerted to something.
So here's what's happened since Flynn made the decision to CONFESS to lying to FBI in that interview, and pleaded guilty to the charge:
Immediately the judge on the case was forced to recuse himself.
Judge recuses in Michael Flynn case The former Trump national security adviser will be sentenced by Clinton appointee Emmet Sullivan. politico.com
It then comes out that both Comey & McCabe testified that the FBI AGENTS who interviewed Flynn *didn't think he lied to them* in that interview.
Comey Told Congress FBI Agents Didn't Think Flynn Lied | RealClearPolitics Comey Told Congress FBI Agents Didn't Think Flynn Lied | RealClearPolitics realclearpolitics.com
House Intel report: McCabe said agents who interviewed Flynn 'didn’t think he was lying' thehill.com
And THEN it was revealed that the Judge who was hearing Flynn's case, and who accepted Flynn's guilty plea, has a CHUMMY buddy-buddy relationship with Peter Strzok & Lisa Page. We know this because text messages were released confirming it.
washingtonpost.com/world/national…
In one of the text messages, Lisa Page actually discusses about how she & Strzok can discuss Flynn's case with Contreras without any messy fallout, such as leading to Contreras having to RECUSE HIMSELF
Text Messages May Shed Light on Judge’s Recusal in Flynn Case A federal judge may have recused himself from overseeing the case of former national security adviser Michael Flynn because a personal friend was connected to the matter, newly disclosed messages exc… wsj.com
The plot, as they say, THICKENS. 
What if Flynn didn't just want to be found ultimately innocent, he wanted to F**K THE F**KING F**KERS WHO'D JUST TRIED TO F**K HIM?
What if he had good solid leads that fake evidence was presented in his case & exculpatory evidence was hidden from him & his lawyers?
By the act of pleading guilty, Flynn converted his case from a routine prosecution on a process perjury charge into a MASSIVE BRADY CASE THAT REACHES ALL THE WAY INTO THE HIGHEST REACHES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.
Right after Judge Contreras was taken off this case, it was handed to Judge Emmet Sullivan, who's nickname is 'The Brady Judge'.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emmet_G._…
It's apparently just a total coincidence that right after Judge Contreras 'recused himself' [that's how the media frames it], the case was then 'randomly assigned' to a judge famous for catching fed. prosecutors committing Brady violations.
Mueller's team has just delayed Flynn's sentencing for another 2 months. That's after making an identical request 2 months ago. So that'll be four months Flynn's sentencing hearing has been delayed.
Mueller requests Flynn's sentencing be delayed at least two more months Special counsel Robert Mueller on Tuesday requested that sentencing for former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn be delayed by at least two months. thehill.com
Well my goodness. Flynn's already pleaded GUILTY to the crime. What's the big hold up? ??
Mueller White Hat theory: he's stalling until the IG report drops and then he'll clear Flynn.
Mueller Black Hat theory: He's desperately trying to save the guilty plea but keeps having to turn over MORE exculpatory evidence to Flynn's team thanks to these guys. 
Either way, whichever one it is, Mueller the Black Hat or White Hat, the Flynn prosecution is in the same place: the toilet.
That guilty plea is not gonna stick.
/end
|
|
