SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Zenyatta Free Speech Board
ZEN 77.480.0%Nov 21 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: NuclearCrystals5/6/2018 9:31:42 PM
   of 22811
 
Do GSLR residents believe the by-law prohibiting extraction in AF-03 has been approved ?

Municipal insurers will not take lightly the fact GSLR administrators submitted at best misleading information and at worst flat out fabrications to CPTAQ in order to have the file discontinued .......... causing severe damage to the company.

Insurers don't generally fund the defence of clients in which defence could mean huge liability.

The Gastem case is vastly different from the GSLR case yet the view from insurers is the same. GSLR insurers will weigh in and they won't have GSLR's back.

Investors should listen to the audio tapes of GSLR meetings ........... a treasure trove of dialogue can be heard in those tapes that seriously impair GSLR administrators arguments.

I'm wondering if a crime has been committed, whereby, personal liability will attach to specific administrators for damage done to the company.

My guess ........ YES.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext