SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Wharf Rat who wrote (72231)5/19/2018 11:37:03 AM
From: koan  Read Replies (2) of 356559
 
Science is not a nail and seldom lends itself to one approach. No one said satellites were superior to ground measures.

Only you did and then you knock it down.

That is called setting up a straw man argument.

How well do ground measurements do with the troposphere??

It is sort of important to measure thatt to!.

The idea you and i-node would know more about AGW than an atmospheric scientist is absurd and telling them where they are making errors is absurd.

<<

"Is a hammer better than a screw driver?"

It is when you have a nail.

This is from one of the 2 satellite groups; the other is Spencer-Christy at UAH. If Mears can say it, you should be able to ask your SIL if it's true.

"Contrary to some (mainly sceptic) opinion, satellite measures are not naturally superior. Measuring the temperature at various levels of the troposphere is a worthwhile endeavour, but it is not a substitute for surface. "
Carl Mears
RSS
Message 31172336
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext