SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
QCOM 171.39-1.0%10:22 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jon Koplik who wrote (146509)5/28/2018 12:59:34 PM
From: JGoren16 Recommendations

Recommended By
AlfaNut
bear 164
Fiero
garrettjax
Jon Koplik

and 11 more members

  Read Replies (2) of 196545
 
Apple has now taken an inconsistent position by arguing in the Samsung lawsuit that the damages should be based on the phone rather than just the design patents infringed. A litigant cannot take inconsistent positions in different law suits. While Apple will likely argue it isn't inconsistent because a "design patent" is different, that seems to me to be a flimsy distinction. Now that Apple has received a benefit (the favorable jury verdict), it's stuck. It might hope that the judgment is reversed on appeal and remanded for a new trial. IMHO opinion Apple has just screwed itself regarding its position vis a vis Qualcomm.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext