Pugs, You should give yourself a little credit. I, for one, obsess on the RMIL thread because few of the yeas seem willing to question your's or Riley's motives or comments. You guys are a couple of shiesters who have led a lot of innocent people to a poorer financial status.
If you or Riley weren't here, I would likely find little to keep me entertained for the short term and would limit my comments to questions about diligence matters etc....
But no... you have to have a conspiracy. You have to believe that any stock where Tonto, Mike, Smartin, Tidglider, TopCat, and myself (apologies if I left out any Nays), then thatstock must have a short position against it. Thus, by default you accuse all of us of being shills for short-sellers.
But Pugs, the way that you or Riley spout the company line and fail to question anything they say tells me that you both must be promoters.. Hell, you're probably getting paid for this aren't you?? <vbg>
And you and I both know that if there is a short position in RMIL, then the price will open higher, when and if it ever opens. So why do you have to continue to make with the unfounded presumptions relating to the company or accusations against us??
Why??
Regards,
Ron |
