Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 174.01

-0.3%

Nov 14 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

To: Jim Mullens who wrote (146731)	5/31/2018 6:28:04 PM
From: JeffreyHF	10 Recommendations of 196649

The industry voluntarily chose consolidation of royalties at the device level decades ago, because the price charged by device sellers was better able to absorb the cost of IP, and pass it on to consumers without impact. Administratively, it was the most efficient way to audit and account for the revenues owed, and paid.There is simply no feasible nor good alternative, and no need to seek one, in the absence of judicial mandate, which will take years of contentious litigation and a complete victory by those seeking to destroy the existing system. ETSI didn't, and the EU IP policy doesn't, require it.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next