| | | Perhaps that was a poor example for me to have used. The point I intended was that there is still a lost of science that we may not have the tools and methods to understand at this point. Like neurology, where a great deal of progress has been made there are huge gaps in the knowledge and understanding yet to be reached.
The pace of learning today is astounding to me. Pick a field, and the level of knowledge is exploding, outlying in chemistry, physics, medicine, computer science and the nano sciences.
But I agree just a probabilistic element does not represent a hole in knowledge, necessarily. I think it took some time, really around the time of Einstein and the others, where they were certain god didn’t play dice or whatever. Turns out, there is an element of gambling all around us. |
|
