I see your resolve to discuss your company rather instead of making wild accusations had no merit. I am not suprised.
You accusations have no merit and you display your total lack of DD of the other stocks you mention. If anyone is interested in those stocks, they can read those threads and decide for themselves whether or not they are credible companies or highly manipulated stocks. I am not going to attempt to defend my actions on any thread, as it would indeed accomplish your purpose of taking the focus off this company.
What these companies have in common is they damaged their own shareholders by making funding their activities through RegS offerings , shorting and RegS go hand in hand in most cases. In most cases company insiders are themselves damaging the shareholders, and in many cases they are also reaping the benefits of the shorting.
ADVR has 300,000,000 outstanding shares, with 1 billion authorized... this for a company that has NEVER sold any product, and they only have one product. ADVR is obviously in existence only to sell stock, not product. Many of the BB companies fall into this category and they exist by hiring promtoers to off load their stock on the unsuspecting people who are led to slaughter by their promises that never come to fuition. Sound familiar ?
Tonto's work on GIFS is legendary, I suggest you get informed. Kugler through his DD found a person who was instrumental in exposing the SEXI sham. People were arrested and are in jail. People who at least give consideration to the DD of others sometimes are saved from losing their money, those who stubbornly refuse to listen lose and blame everyone except the management who are the real culprits. .
For better or for worse, if you read enough threads you begin to develop your impressions of whose information to trust and who the hypesters are. Eventually you may end up on the same threads. the same hypesters seem to work in tandem as do the same "nays"
You and others have chosen to follow Riley's recommendations and you have posted on the same threads. I noticed many here followed his recommendations on CTAE, did you win or lose?
A word to the wise, don't take tonto too lightly. Your insulting insinuations about others cannot ever make them true and you may have to answer for them.
You want to discuss the squeeze? Tell us how you determine that there is a large short position, even Morgan said in Equities that he thought there were many shorts but he thought that many of them had covered. What do you know that he doesn't ? To say that the presence of nays is your proof is an idiotic leap in logic and a possible attempt to divert attention from the fundamental information. I consider intimidation to be a form of manipulation and in that vein, I talked to the SEC, a few months ago, about some of the activites that have taken place here. I would hate to see them waste their time on this nonsense. |
