WDC, NAND, NVM, enterprise storage systems, etc. Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : WDC, NAND, NVM, enterprise storage systems, etc.

SNDK 224.07

-8.9%

10:52 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

FJB

To: SiliconAlley who wrote (3826)	6/12/2018 2:06:51 PM
From: storage_savant	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) of 4828

1. I have in depth technical understanding of storage systems and requirements. I trust my judgement more than some executive who may not have an in depth understanding of the technical trade offs. I guarantee you that if the technical people tell an executive that they can reduce storage costs by 30% for a subset of workloads, they will go for it. Take my word for it and wait a few years. 2. I just wanted to understand the supposed "secret sauce" of the M systems QLC IP. Intel/Micron, Samsung, Toshiba/WDC have all announced QLC and we don't have enough information about which one is the best. So far I haven't been able to find any detail on what you are talking about. I am skeptical that IP for planar NAND is directly applicable to 3d, as they are very different.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next