FRANKLIN TELECOM (FTEL) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FRANKLIN TELECOM (FTEL)

FTEL 0.935

-4.1%

9:32 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: BuzzVA who wrote (25119)	1/14/1998 12:34:00 PM
From: VALUESPEC	of 41046

Buzz, was I terrorizing the NWCI thread? Didn't I say it was technically a good buy around $ 1.50 at the very end of December? It was $ 1.56 and is now $2.00 ! Didn't I document the apparent inconsistancies of the NWCI's managment. Didn't they even change the statement on their website about doubling stores becuase they were clearly misleading investors by those statements? Buzz, you may not have liked what I was saying, but I stick by eveything I reported. I also told you that I was interested in NWCI and it was runner-up to a big purchase (for me) of its stock. As it turned out, the inconsitancies I found caused me not to buy it. When later asked what I bought instead, I said I bought a lot of SKYC @ an average cost of about $ 7.125 (go to the SKYC folder to verify it. I posted when I bought). Right now it is $ 8.50b $ 8.625 and I still have a large position in it. Where have I been wrong? Am I wrong because I document the reasons for my opinions and you simply have "opinions" which differ from mine? I'm not trying to terrorize any stock, unless you call stating good reasons for concern, IMO, terrorizing a stock. FTEL: $ 5.91b $ 6.06a vol 91,100 VALUESPEC valuespec.com

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next