| | | Brumar was a never-Trumper from the very beginning.
Indeed. When he slandered POW's to attack McCain it was the first signal. I discovered his slavish praise of Vladimir Putin and defense of him over the polonium poisoning of Litvinenko, the downing of the Malaysian airliner, and the invasion of Crimea and Ukraine. So from the beginning, he displayed a lack of honor and decency and talked as if he were compromised by Putin.
I think there are others, but they don't seem to want to post on Brumar's thread. So Brumar's over there talking to himself. He should be on this thread, it would seem.
That people (69 apparently) read the thread and repost material elsewhere is enough for me. I request leftwingers not turn my thread into a leftwing party and have asked some of those folks not to post there much and even banned one or two. Non-lefties who are appalled by Trump are actively harassed so they've largely retreated from SI.
Also, I think he was totally behind the Iraq war and stuck with Bush through it all. One characteristic of Trump voters is that they are either people who never bought into the war in the first place, or they supported it but now want to get it in the rear view mirror as fast as possible.
Wrong about Trumpers. 99% of them on SI were as supportive as I was. They just 'changed their mind' when Trump attacked W as the 'worst President in history.' They're in a personality cult and they don't differ with their thought leader. They change their thoughts or shut up about them.
Old-style Republicans, like Will, Krauthammer, Rich Lowery, and all the well-known neo-con names are trying to rewrite history and lay down a deceitful meme. They're pushing the idea that Trump is destroying the GOP. They won't admit that it was them who destroyed the GOP.
Who cares who destroyed it. It's the Trumpublican party and not a home for conservatives anymore afai am concerned.
No one else could have defeated Hillary
Wrong. That Trump squeaked out a win he didn't even think would happen on election night, shows how weak a candidate Hillary was. EVERY other candidate could've beat her. And the people who run the Republican party planned on Hillary winning. A weak Democratic President they could rally against but would keep them from being responsible for anything was why Trump. |
|
