SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Peak Oil reality or Myth, of an out of Control System

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: dvdw© who wrote (1402)7/6/2018 1:24:14 PM
From: JimisJim of 1580
 
And why not? I mean, transporting LNG requires releasing the "boil off" along the way... I've been saying for a couple years that since they're building a bunch of new LNG carriers for when all the export terminals are up and running in N. America, they might as well build the new ones to "burn" LNG -- specifically the boil off, maybe more, maybe less that what might be needed to propel the ship.

Seems to me, shipping lines would benefit financially doing that -- it should be more efficient, too, but I'd have to run the numbers of typical bunker fuel vs. LNG (and how much LNG would be needed to deliver a cargo of LNG to Europe or to Asia.

There's already a large number of LNG vehicles, esp. fleets: all of the Waste Management trucks here have switched, our county buses have all been converted, many (and more all the time) UPS trucks run on it... I've seen a lot of UPS triple trailer semis powered by LNG between LA and Salt Lake City (I-15 has adequate fueling station support to make that possible).
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext