Chess Masters Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Chess Masters

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bill Ulrich who wrote (98)	1/14/1998 7:25:00 PM
From: MSB	Read Replies (1) of 1124

Mr.B, I'm perplexed. You let me take your white bishop with my white bishop, but instead of taking my white bishop, you chose to take my pawn with your knight, right. Now, after threatening said knight with my pawn (E7E6), you've chosen to move your queen in front of your king. I don't want to sound like an ungrateful recipient of two of your major pieces (my next move is BLACK (6) E6xD5 [PxN]), but I am really scratching my head over this particular game. Is this really part of your strategy? I'm assuming you'll take my pawn with your's on the next move thereby putting me in check. I will then block with my knight or black bishop. But I can't figure out where you're going to go from there. Mr.B, I don't mean to imply a negativity here, but if you'd like to call it a draw I'm willing. I'm thinking maybe you might have a lot on your mind at the moment . . .yes? WHITE (6) D1E2 BLACK (6) E6xD5 (PxN)

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next