2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 378.38

+2.7%

Nov 10 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: elmatador who wrote (142710)	7/23/2018 9:41:29 AM
From: oldirtybastard	Read Replies (1) of 217669

fortunately, this is not a world issue, every place is for itself as it should be. as you can see the places where the most will die due to disease and starvation are making the most replacements. the other places will need more austerity to compensate locally if the aging are a drain..., not having more kids can be viewed as an austerity measure no? before the kids grow up to (you hope) support the older folks (or be on the dole themselves, and everything in between) the kids are a financial drain, thus less kids = near term austerity, and maybe even long term. "hey it turns out we didn't need those guys anyway" lol might not be a bad thing, unintended consequences work the other way too. a longer life, with less drain on the collective due to high population may be better than the alternative if you're on the right side of things

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next