SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: zzpat who wrote (1082395)8/9/2018 2:12:34 PM
From: RetiredNow  Read Replies (2) of 1578391
 
Actually, the IG had a bunch of critical comments and the FBI does not typically try to pre-empt the DOJ's decision as to whether or not to prosecute an individual. What I found and many legal experts found to be incongruous about the IG report was that the IG found bias in some of the investigators, but then found that the conclusion not to investigate Hillary further or recommend for prosecution was NOT biased. That doesn't pass the sniff test. We know without a shadow of a doubt from the texts from Strokzy that the lead investigator of Hillary was biased in her favor and VERY biased against Trump. That is classic fruit of the poisoned tree. All conclusions from that person and ratification of those conclusions would logically be biased. The IG punted for political expediency, plain and simple.

This stinks to high heaven.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News