SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : NNVC - NanoViricides, Inc.
NNVC 1.1900.0%Dec 26 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Straynut who wrote (10833)8/13/2018 9:21:53 PM
From: old 'n cranky  Read Replies (1) of 12873
 
I don't understand. The short interest has been covered to the point where it's not worth a hill of beans anymore and NOW you find the remaining short interest meaningful?

Please try to make your case in a way that it can be understood.

There's more to the short report than meets the eye. Ask yourselves a simple question: why would anyone short a stock selling at .34?
The short interest report doesn't reflect shares that have been shorted at the price at the time of the report.

whoever is behind the over 4+ years of shorting Nano has an ulterior motive------ to BUY as much stock as possible from the panicked retail sellers who own most of the "float".
That has already happened. It's why the short interest number has dropped.

On Wednesday the institutions have to report for the period ending June 30. I suspect a large number will have sold out.
That may be so, but most institutions had already bailed when NNVC fell out of the R2000.

Who did they sell to? You guessed it ------- the same Cabal that 2 years ago admitted they then owned 12.6 million shares!
They were sold on the open market. Is that where the Cabals of hedge funds do their buying?

If you don't explain yourself a bit more clearly the only people who will embrace your theory will also be people who don't understand it.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext