Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 164.53

-0.4%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

To: VinnieBagOfDonuts who wrote (148853)	9/2/2018 11:14:14 AM
From: JeffreyHF	9 Recommendations Read Replies (4) of 197208

Having now read the Motion, the FTC is claiming that since the TIA and ATIS are located in the U.S., the interpretation of obligations made to 3GPP and ETSI, under the controlling French law, are irrelevant, and U.S. courts should independently define FRAND obligations under U.S. law without regard to the intent and understanding of the overarching FRAND commitments made by Qualcomm to the primary international bodies. That seems specious and back-asswards to me. The derivative and collateral commitments made by Qualcomm to TIA and ATIS cannot be, and were not intended to be, more stringent than those made to ETSI and 3GPP, but rather their interpretation must be determined by French law, the interpretations of the relevant international bodies, and decades of industry custom and usage.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next